EPYC 4464P vs Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 350 Watt
52.66
+72.4%
EPYC 4464P
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
30.54

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X outperforms EPYC 4464P by an impressive 72% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 7960X and EPYC 4464P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28135
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation33.4169.97
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency14.2327.51
Architecture codenameStorm Peak (2023)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date19 October 2023 (1 year ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4464P has 109% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper 7960X.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X and EPYC 4464P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads4824
Base clock speed4.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed5.3 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm5 nm
Die size4x 71 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistors26,280 million13,140 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 7960X and EPYC 4464P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketsTR5AM5
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 7960X and EPYC 4464P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 7960X and EPYC 4464P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 7960X and EPYC 4464P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 7960X and EPYC 4464P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes4828

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X 52.66
+72.4%
EPYC 4464P 30.54

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X 83655
+72.4%
EPYC 4464P 48518

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 52.66 30.54
Recency 19 October 2023 21 May 2024
Physical cores 24 12
Threads 48 24
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 105 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X has a 72.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

EPYC 4464P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper 7960X is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 4464P in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 7960X is a desktop processor while EPYC 4464P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 7960X and EPYC 4464P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
AMD EPYC 4464P
EPYC 4464P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 43 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 7960X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 8 votes

Rate EPYC 4464P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 7960X or EPYC 4464P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.