Xeon Platinum 8351N vs EPYC 9754

VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9754 and Xeon Platinum 8351N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.09no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency16.62no data
Architecture codenameBergamo (2023)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,900no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9754 and Xeon Platinum 8351N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12836
Threads25672
Base clock speed2.25 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)54 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm10 nm
Die size8x 73 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data76 °C
Number of transistors71,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9754 and Xeon Platinum 8351N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon Platinum 8351N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 9754 and Xeon Platinum 8351N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon Platinum 8351N are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon Platinum 8351N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon Platinum 8351N.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes12864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 9754 1603
Xeon Platinum 8351N 1617
+0.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 9754 15552
+2.1%
Xeon Platinum 8351N 15233

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 June 2023 6 April 2021
Physical cores 128 36
Threads 256 72
Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 225 Watt

EPYC 9754 has an age advantage of 2 years, 255.6% more physical cores and 255.6% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon Platinum 8351N, on the other hand, has 60% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 9754 and Xeon Platinum 8351N. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9754 and Xeon Platinum 8351N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754
Intel Xeon Platinum 8351N
Xeon Platinum 8351N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 37 votes

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8351N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9754 or Xeon Platinum 8351N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.