EPYC 7282 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
41.25
+107%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms EPYC 7282 by a whopping 107% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 7282 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking64297
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.6214.98
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD EPYC
Power efficiency13.4315.13
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date25 November 2019 (4 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999$650

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has 4% better value for money than EPYC 7282.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 7282 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads6432
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate8 × 16 GT/sno data
Multiplier3728
L1 cache96K (per core)1 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)8 MB
L3 cache128 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Number of transistors19,200 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 7282 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketTR4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 7282. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 7282 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 7282. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size256 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth102.403 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 41.25
+107%
EPYC 7282 19.91

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 63128
+107%
EPYC 7282 30474

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 1661
+51.6%
EPYC 7282 1096

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 13790
+70.8%
EPYC 7282 8073

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 41.25 19.91
Recency 25 November 2019 7 August 2019
Physical cores 32 16
Threads 64 32
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 120 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has a 107.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

EPYC 7282, on the other hand, has 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7282 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is a desktop processor while EPYC 7282 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 7282, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
AMD EPYC 7282
EPYC 7282

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 347 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 45 votes

Rate EPYC 7282 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 3970X or EPYC 7282, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.