Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs EPYC 7742

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7742
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
45.18
+10.4%
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
40.92

EPYC 7742 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 3970X by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7742 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking4463
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.7116.49
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)7 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,950$1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has 508% better value for money than EPYC 7742.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7742 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads12864
Base clock speed2.25 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rateno data8 × 16 GT/s
Multiplier22.537
L1 cache4 MB2 MB
L2 cache32 MB16 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)128 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 million23540 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7742 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketTR4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7742 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7742 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7742 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size4 TiB256 GB
Max memory channels84
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s102.403 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7742 45.18
+10.4%
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 40.92

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7742 69663
+10.4%
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 63106

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7742 1204
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 1666
+38.4%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7742 11782
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 13859
+17.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 45.18 40.92
Recency 7 August 2019 7 November 2019
Physical cores 64 32
Threads 128 64
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 280 Watt

EPYC 7742 has a 10.4% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 24.4% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months.

The EPYC 7742 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7742 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7742 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7742
EPYC 7742
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 128 votes

Rate EPYC 7742 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 345 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7742 or Ryzen Threadripper 3970X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.