EPYC 9474F vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
2018
16 cores / 32 threads, 180 Watt
18.54
EPYC 9474F
2022
48 cores / 96 threads, 360 Watt
66.11
+257%

EPYC 9474F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2950X by a whopping 257% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and EPYC 9474F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31711
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.125.29
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD EPYC
Power efficiency9.7517.38
Architecture codenameZEN+ (2018−2019)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899$6,780

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has 53% better value for money than EPYC 9474F.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and EPYC 9474F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads3296
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3536
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size213 mm28x 72 mm2
Number of transistors19,200 million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and EPYC 9474F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketSocket TR4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and EPYC 9474F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and EPYC 9474F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and EPYC 9474F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size2 TiB6 TiB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth93.867 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and EPYC 9474F.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 18.54
EPYC 9474F 66.11
+257%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 29456
EPYC 9474F 105010
+256%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.54 66.11
Recency 13 August 2018 10 November 2022
Physical cores 16 48
Threads 32 96
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 360 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has 100% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9474F, on the other hand, has a 256.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9474F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is a desktop processor while EPYC 9474F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and EPYC 9474F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
AMD EPYC 9474F
EPYC 9474F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 55 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 19 votes

Rate EPYC 9474F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 2950X or EPYC 9474F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.