EPYC Embedded 8124P vs Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and EPYC Embedded 8124P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) | no data |
| Architecture codename | Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 1 October 2024 (recently) | 18 September 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and EPYC Embedded 8124P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c | 32 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.45 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 54 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 73 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 75 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 17,750 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and EPYC Embedded 8124P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FP8 | SP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and EPYC Embedded 8124P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and EPYC Embedded 8124P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and EPYC Embedded 8124P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 880M | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and EPYC Embedded 8124P.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 96 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2024 | 18 September 2023 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 16 |
| Threads | 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 125 Watt |
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 346.4% lower power consumption.
EPYC Embedded 8124P, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and EPYC Embedded 8124P. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 8124P is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and EPYC Embedded 8124P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
