EPYC 9174F vs Ryzen 9 5950X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 5950X
2020
16 cores / 32 threads, 105 Watt
29.25
EPYC 9174F
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 320 Watt
35.60
+21.7%

EPYC 9174F outperforms Ryzen 9 5950X by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 5950X and EPYC 9174F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking159105
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation26.446.69
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9AMD EPYC
Power efficiency25.8710.33
Architecture codenameVermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date8 October 2020 (4 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799$3,850

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 5950X has 295% better value for money than EPYC 9174F.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 5950X and EPYC 9174F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3232
Base clock speed3.4 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplier3441
L1 cache1 MB1 MB
L2 cache8 MB16 MB
L3 cache64 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeCPU cores: 2x 80.7 sq. mm., I/O: 125 mm28x 72 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 5950X and EPYC 9174F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 5950X and EPYC 9174F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHAno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 5950X and EPYC 9174F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 5950X and EPYC 9174F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size128 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 5950X and EPYC 9174F.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 5950X 29.25
EPYC 9174F 35.60
+21.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 5950X 45599
EPYC 9174F 55485
+21.7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 9 5950X 2216
+0.1%
EPYC 9174F 2214

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 9 5950X 12131
EPYC 9174F 16965
+39.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.25 35.60
Recency 8 October 2020 10 November 2022
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 320 Watt

Ryzen 9 5950X has 204.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9174F, on the other hand, has a 21.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9174F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 5950X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 5950X is a desktop processor while EPYC 9174F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 5950X and EPYC 9174F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Ryzen 9 5950X
AMD EPYC 9174F
EPYC 9174F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2493 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 9174F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 5950X or EPYC 9174F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.