Ryzen 7 7435HS vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7435HS by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 7 7435HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 386 | 467 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) | Ryzen 7000 Series |
| Power efficiency | 45.33 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Rembrandt R |
| Release date | 13 June 2023 (1 year ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 7 7435HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | 210 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 95 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 7 7435HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FP7/FP8 | FP7r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 7 7435HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | USB 4, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 7 7435HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-4800 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 780M | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 17.40 | 15.58 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has a 11.7% higher aggregate performance score, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 28.6% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 7435HS in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 7 7435HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
