Apple M1 Max vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
16.84
+21.2%
Apple M1 Max
2021
10 cores / 10 threads, 2060 Watt
13.90

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Apple M1 Max by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Apple M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking381526
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)Apple M-Series
Power efficiency45.53no data
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)no data
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)18 October 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1610
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.06 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.22 GHz
L1 cache512 KB2.9 MB
L2 cache8 MB28 MB
L3 cache16 MB48 MB
Chip lithography4 nm5 nm
Die size178 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data57000 Million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP7/FP8no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt2060 ‑ 3220 Watt

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 780MApple M1 Max 32-Core GPU

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 16.84
+21.2%
Apple M1 Max 13.90

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 26745
+21.1%
Apple M1 Max 22080

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2440
+44.3%
Apple M1 Max 1691

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 269
+34.5%
Apple M1 Max 200

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 11037
Apple M1 Max 12697
+15%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 1888
+5.9%
Apple M1 Max 1782

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 363
+0.8%
Apple M1 Max 360

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.84 13.90
Recency 13 June 2023 18 October 2021
Physical cores 8 10
Threads 16 10
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 2060 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has a 21.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 60% more threads, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 5785.7% lower power consumption.

Apple M1 Max, on the other hand, has 25% more physical cores.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 Max in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Apple M1 Max
M1 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 58 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 684 votes

Rate Apple M1 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS or Apple M1 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.