Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Apple M1 Max

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M1 Max
2021
10 cores / 10 threads
13.91
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
17.74
+27.5%

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS outperforms Apple M1 Max by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M1 Max and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking534350
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M-SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiencyno data47.97
Architecture codenameno dataPhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date18 October 2021 (3 years ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M1 Max and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1016
Base clock speed2.06 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.22 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache2.9 MB512 KB
L2 cache28 MB8 MB
L3 cache48 MB16 MB
Chip lithography5 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors57000 Millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Apple M1 Max and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataFP7/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M1 Max 13.91
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 17.74
+27.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M1 Max 22098
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 28175
+27.5%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Apple M1 Max 1691
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 2360
+39.6%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Apple M1 Max 200
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 275
+37.5%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Apple M1 Max 12697
+27.5%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 9959

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Apple M1 Max 1782
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 1956
+9.8%

WebXPRT 3

Apple M1 Max 360
+21.6%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 296

CrossMark Overall

Apple M1 Max 1615
+3.9%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 1555

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.91 17.74
Recency 18 October 2021 13 June 2023
Physical cores 10 8
Threads 10 16
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm

Apple M1 Max has 25% more physical cores.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, on the other hand, has a 27.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 60% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 Max in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M1 Max and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M1 Max
M1 Max
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 692 votes

Rate Apple M1 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 47 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M1 Max or Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.