EPYC 7763 vs Ryzen 5 3600X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3600X
2019
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
11.45
EPYC 7763
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
53.23
+365%

EPYC 7763 outperforms Ryzen 5 3600X by a whopping 365% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 3600X and EPYC 7763 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking68825
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.943.32
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD EPYC
Power efficiency11.3517.90
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249$7,890

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 3600X has 470% better value for money than EPYC 7763.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3600X and EPYC 7763 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads12128
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.45 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplierno data24.5
L1 cache384 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3600X and EPYC 7763 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3600X and EPYC 7763. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3600X and EPYC 7763 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3600X and EPYC 7763. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3600X and EPYC 7763.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3600X 11.45
EPYC 7763 53.23
+365%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 3600X 18187
EPYC 7763 84557
+365%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 3600X 1669
+24.2%
EPYC 7763 1344

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 3600X 7093
EPYC 7763 10361
+46.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.45 53.23
Recency 27 May 2019 15 March 2021
Physical cores 6 64
Threads 12 128
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 280 Watt

Ryzen 5 3600X has 194.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7763, on the other hand, has a 364.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 966.7% more physical cores and 966.7% more threads.

The EPYC 7763 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 3600X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 3600X is a desktop processor while EPYC 7763 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3600X and EPYC 7763, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Ryzen 5 3600X
AMD EPYC 7763
EPYC 7763

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2798 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1197 votes

Rate EPYC 7763 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3600X or EPYC 7763, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.