EPYC 7443P vs Ryzen 5 3600X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3600X
2019
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
11.45
EPYC 7443P
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 200 Watt
35.86
+213%

EPYC 7443P outperforms Ryzen 5 3600X by a whopping 213% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 3600X and EPYC 7443P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking690103
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.8524.21
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD EPYC
Power efficiency11.4116.97
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249$1,337

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7443P has 28% better value for money than Ryzen 5 3600X.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3600X and EPYC 7443P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1248
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.85 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz4 GHz
Multiplierno data28.5
L1 cache384 KB1536 KB
L2 cache3 MB12 MB
L3 cache32 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data4x 81 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3600X and EPYC 7443P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3600X and EPYC 7443P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3600X and EPYC 7443P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3600X and EPYC 7443P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3600X and EPYC 7443P.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3600X 11.45
EPYC 7443P 35.86
+213%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 3600X 18184
EPYC 7443P 56966
+213%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 3600X 1669
EPYC 7443P 1686
+1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 3600X 7090
EPYC 7443P 14496
+104%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.45 35.86
Recency 27 May 2019 12 January 2021
Physical cores 6 24
Threads 12 48
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 200 Watt

Ryzen 5 3600X has 110.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7443P, on the other hand, has a 213.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The EPYC 7443P is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 3600X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 3600X is a desktop processor while EPYC 7443P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3600X and EPYC 7443P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Ryzen 5 3600X
AMD EPYC 7443P
EPYC 7443P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2808 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 25 votes

Rate EPYC 7443P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3600X or EPYC 7443P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.