Ryzen 7 8700F vs Ryzen 5 2400G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 2400G
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.72
Ryzen 7 8700F
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
20.33
+255%

Ryzen 7 8700F outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G by a whopping 255% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 7 8700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1129281
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.3655.27
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency8.0128.46
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Phoenix (2023−2024)
Release date8 January 2018 (6 years ago)1 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169$270

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 8700F has 769% better value for money than Ryzen 5 2400G.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 7 8700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.6 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5 GHz
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache386 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size209.78 mm2178 mm2
Number of transistors4950 Million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 7 8700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4AM5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 7 8700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 7 8700F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 7 8700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 11N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 7 8700F.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1220

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 2400G 5.72
Ryzen 7 8700F 20.33
+255%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 2400G 8729
Ryzen 7 8700F 31045
+256%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.72 20.33
Recency 8 January 2018 1 April 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm

Ryzen 7 8700F has a 255.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 8700F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 2400G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 7 8700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Ryzen 5 2400G
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
Ryzen 7 8700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1404 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 58 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 2400G or Ryzen 7 8700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.