Ultra 7 258V vs Processor N200

VS

Aggregate performance score

Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.56
Core Ultra 7 258V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.55
+704%

Core Ultra 7 258V outperforms Processor N200 by a whopping 704% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Processor N200 and Core Ultra 7 258V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2122619
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-Nno data
Power efficiency24.6169.86
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-N (2023)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$193no data

Detailed specifications

Processor N200 and Core Ultra 7 258V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed0.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Processor N200 and Core Ultra 7 258V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1264FCBGA2833
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N200 and Core Ultra 7 258V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Processor N200 and Core Ultra 7 258V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N200 and Core Ultra 7 258V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N200 and Core Ultra 7 258V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channelDDR5
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.95 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Processor N200 and Core Ultra 7 258V integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Processor N200 and Core Ultra 7 258V integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Processor N200 and Core Ultra 7 258V integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N200 and Core Ultra 7 258V.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes94
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Processor N200 1.56
Ultra 7 258V 12.55
+704%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Processor N200 3937
Ultra 7 258V 9982
+154%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Processor N200 7549
Ultra 7 258V 36479
+383%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Processor N200 3902
Ultra 7 258V 10693
+174%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Processor N200 3
Ultra 7 258V 20
+620%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Processor N200 219
Ultra 7 258V 1593
+627%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Processor N200 113
Ultra 7 258V 270
+139%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Processor N200 1.36
Ultra 7 258V 3.36
+147%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Processor N200 3.2
Ultra 7 258V 7.6
+138%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Processor N200 2115
Ultra 7 258V 8536
+304%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Processor N200 1540
Ultra 7 258V 9723
+531%

Blender(-)

Processor N200 2150
+476%
Ultra 7 258V 374

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Processor N200 928
Ultra 7 258V 1973
+113%

7-Zip Single

Processor N200 3230
Ultra 7 258V 5553
+71.9%

7-Zip

Processor N200 7146
Ultra 7 258V 36068
+405%

WebXPRT 3

Processor N200 171
Ultra 7 258V 270
+57.3%

CrossMark Overall

Processor N200 614
Ultra 7 258V 1670
+172%

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Processor N200 4297
+661%
Ultra 7 258V 565

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Processor N200 1660
Ultra 7 258V 10967
+561%

Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core

Processor N200 956
Ultra 7 258V 2723
+185%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.56 12.55
Integrated graphics card 3.29 13.29
Recency 3 January 2023 24 September 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 17 Watt

Processor N200 has 183.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 258V, on the other hand, has a 704.5% higher aggregate performance score, 304% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 258V is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Processor N200 and Core Ultra 7 258V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Processor N200
Processor N200
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Core Ultra 7 258V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 148 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 14 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 258V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Processor N200 or Core Ultra 7 258V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.