Celeron M 390 vs Pro A6-8500B
Aggregate performance score
Pro A6-8500B outperforms Celeron M 390 by a whopping 461% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pro A6-8500B and Celeron M 390 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2467 | 3258 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Carrizo | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 6.37 | 0.81 |
| Architecture codename | Carrizo (2015−2018) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | 3 June 2015 (9 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Pro A6-8500B and Celeron M 390 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 1 MB L2 KB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 3100 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.004V-1.292V |
Compatibility
Information on Pro A6-8500B and Celeron M 390 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FP4 | PPGA478, H-PBGA479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 21 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pro A6-8500B and Celeron M 390. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | HSA 1.0 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | FMA4 | - |
| AVX | AVX | - |
| FRTC | + | - |
| FreeSync | + | - |
| TrueAudio | + | - |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| PowerGating | + | - |
| Out-of-band client management | + | - |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| RAID | + | - |
| HSA | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Pro A6-8500B and Celeron M 390 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pro A6-8500B and Celeron M 390 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
| IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pro A6-8500B and Celeron M 390. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3/DDR3L-1600 | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | no data |
| iGPU core count | 4 | no data |
| จำนวนพาธไลน์ | 256 | no data |
| Enduro | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pro A6-8500B and Celeron M 390 integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Pro A6-8500B and Celeron M 390 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
| Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pro A6-8500B and Celeron M 390.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.01 | 0.18 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 21 Watt |
Pro A6-8500B has a 461.1% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.
The Pro A6-8500B is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 390 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pro A6-8500B and Celeron M 390, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
