Sempron 2200+ vs Phenom X4 9150e
Aggregate performance score
Phenom X4 9150e outperforms Sempron 2200+ by a whopping 710% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2812 | 3629 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 0.53 | 0.07 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Agena (2007−2008) | Barton (2001−2004) |
| Release date | July 2008 (17 years ago) | January 2001 (24 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $30 |
Detailed specifications
Phenom X4 9150e and Sempron 2200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 285 mm2 | 101 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 450 million | 63 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom X4 9150e and Sempron 2200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM2+ | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 62 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X4 9150e and Sempron 2200+ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.81 | 0.10 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 62 Watt |
Phenom X4 9150e has a 710% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Sempron 2200+, on the other hand, has 4.8% lower power consumption.
The AMD Phenom X4 9150e is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Sempron 2200+ in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
