Phenom X4 9150e vs Celeron G555

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G555
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.87
Phenom X4 9150e
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
0.89
+2.3%

Phenom X4 9150e outperforms Celeron G555 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G555 and Phenom X4 9150e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25652555
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.271.29
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Agena (2007−2008)
Release date1 September 2012 (12 years ago)July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G555 and Phenom X4 9150e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size131 mm2285 mm2
Number of transistors504 million450 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G555 and Phenom X4 9150e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket1155AM2+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G555 and Phenom X4 9150e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G555 and Phenom X4 9150e are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G555 and Phenom X4 9150e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD (Sandy Bridge)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G555 and Phenom X4 9150e.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G555 0.87
Phenom X4 9150e 0.89
+2.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G555 1388
Phenom X4 9150e 1414
+1.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.87 0.89
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm

Celeron G555 has a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Phenom X4 9150e, on the other hand, has a 2.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron G555 and Phenom X4 9150e.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G555 and Phenom X4 9150e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G555
Celeron G555
AMD Phenom X4 9150e
Phenom X4 9150e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 10 votes

Rate Celeron G555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 24 votes

Rate Phenom X4 9150e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G555 or Phenom X4 9150e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.