Phenom II X3 N870 vs Pentium J2850
Aggregate performance score
Phenom II X3 N870 outperforms Pentium J2850 by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium J2850 and Phenom II X3 N870 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2754 | 2418 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Pentium | 3x AMD Phenom II |
Power efficiency | 6.06 | 2.87 |
Architecture codename | Bay Trail-D (2013) | Champlain (2010−2011) |
Release date | 1 September 2013 (11 years ago) | 16 December 2010 (13 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $94 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Pentium J2850 and Phenom II X3 N870 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 3 (Tri-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 3 |
Base clock speed | 2.41 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 3600 MHz |
L1 cache | 224 KB | 384 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1.5 MB |
L3 cache | 2 MB L2 Cache | no data |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium J2850 and Phenom II X3 N870 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | FCBGA1170 | S1 (S1g4) |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium J2850 and Phenom II X3 N870. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x MMX(+), 3DNow!(+), SSE(1,2,3,4A),-64, AMD-V |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
FDI | - | no data |
RST | - | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium J2850 and Phenom II X3 N870 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
EDB | + | no data |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium J2850 and Phenom II X3 N870 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium J2850 and Phenom II X3 N870. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 854 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pentium J2850 and Phenom II X3 N870 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium J2850 and Phenom II X3 N870.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 4 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.64 | 1.06 |
Recency | 1 September 2013 | 16 December 2010 |
Physical cores | 4 | 3 |
Threads | 4 | 3 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 45 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
Pentium J2850 has an age advantage of 2 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.
Phenom II X3 N870, on the other hand, has a 65.6% higher aggregate performance score.
The Phenom II X3 N870 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium J2850 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium J2850 and Phenom II X3 N870, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.