Phenom II X3 N870 vs Celeron J1900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J1900
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.75
Phenom II X3 N870
2010
3 cores / 3 threads, 35 Watt
1.10
+46.7%

Phenom II X3 N870 outperforms Celeron J1900 by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1900 and Phenom II X3 N870 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26492393
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron3x AMD Phenom II
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date1 November 2013 (10 years ago)16 December 2010 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$82no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1900 and Phenom II X3 N870 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads43
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.42 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rateno data3600 MHz
L1 cache224 KB384 KB
L2 cache2 MB1.5 MB
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1900 and Phenom II X3 N870 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1170S1 (S1g4)
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1900 and Phenom II X3 N870. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x MMX(+), 3DNow!(+), SSE(1,2,3,4A),-64, AMD-V
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
StatusLaunchedno data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1900 and Phenom II X3 N870 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1900 and Phenom II X3 N870 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1900 and Phenom II X3 N870. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency854 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1900 and Phenom II X3 N870 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1900 and Phenom II X3 N870.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.75 1.10
Recency 1 November 2013 16 December 2010
Physical cores 4 3
Threads 4 3
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron J1900 has an age advantage of 2 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.

Phenom II X3 N870, on the other hand, has a 46.7% higher aggregate performance score.

The Phenom II X3 N870 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1900 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1900 and Phenom II X3 N870, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1900
Celeron J1900
AMD Phenom II X3 N870
Phenom II X3 N870

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 191 vote

Rate Celeron J1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 33 votes

Rate Phenom II X3 N870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1900 or Phenom II X3 N870, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.