i7-13790F vs Pentium G620

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G620
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.79
Core i7-13790F
2023
16 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
30.26
+3730%

Core i7-13790F outperforms Pentium G620 by a whopping 3730% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G620 and Core i7-13790F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2633148
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.4359.00
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.1142.45
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date22 May 2011 (13 years ago)10 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$60$441

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-13790F has 694% better value for money than Pentium G620.

Detailed specifications

Pentium G620 and Core i7-13790F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)33 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size131 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G620 and Core i7-13790F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA11551700
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G620 and Core i7-13790F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Pentium G620 and Core i7-13790F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G620 and Core i7-13790F are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G620 and Core i7-13790F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsN/A
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G620 and Core i7-13790F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G620 and Core i7-13790F.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G620 0.79
i7-13790F 30.26
+3730%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G620 1213
i7-13790F 46309
+3718%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.79 30.26
Recency 22 May 2011 10 February 2023
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 24
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm

i7-13790F has a 3730.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 700% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i7-13790F is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G620 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G620 and Core i7-13790F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G620
Pentium G620
Intel Core i7-13790F
Core i7-13790F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 504 votes

Rate Pentium G620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 58 votes

Rate Core i7-13790F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G620 or Core i7-13790F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.