i7-13790F vs i3-2100

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-2100
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.17
Core i7-13790F
2023
16 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
29.15
+2391%

Core i7-13790F outperforms Core i3-2100 by a whopping 2391% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-2100 and Core i7-13790F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2358150
Place by popularity100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.2856.10
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.7042.44
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date20 February 2011 (13 years ago)10 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$73$441

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-13790F has 19936% better value for money than i3-2100.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-2100 and Core i7-13790F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)33 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size131 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-2100 and Core i7-13790F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA11551700
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-2100 and Core i7-13790F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-2100 and Core i7-13790F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-2100 and Core i7-13790F are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-2100 and Core i7-13790F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2000N/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-2100 and Core i7-13790F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-2100 and Core i7-13790F.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-2100 1.17
i7-13790F 29.15
+2391%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-2100 1858
i7-13790F 46309
+2392%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.17 29.15
Recency 20 February 2011 10 February 2023
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm

i7-13790F has a 2391.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 700% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i7-13790F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-2100 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-2100 and Core i7-13790F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-2100
Core i3-2100
Intel Core i7-13790F
Core i7-13790F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 2020 votes

Rate Core i3-2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 58 votes

Rate Core i7-13790F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-2100 or Core i7-13790F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.