A8-3820 vs Pentium G4400TE
Aggregate performance score
Pentium G4400TE outperforms A8-3820 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium G4400TE and A8-3820 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2220 | 2228 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Pentium | no data |
| Power efficiency | 3.72 | 1.99 |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Llano (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 (9 years ago) | 20 December 2011 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $64 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Pentium G4400TE and A8-3820 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 24 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 98.57 mm2 | 228 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 1750 Million | 1,178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium G4400TE and A8-3820 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | FM1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G4400TE and A8-3820. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G4400TE and A8-3820 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G4400TE and A8-3820. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1600 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 510 | AMD Radeon HD 6550D |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G4400TE and A8-3820.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.40 | 1.39 |
| Integrated graphics card | 1.61 | 1.04 |
| Recency | 1 September 2015 | 20 December 2011 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Pentium G4400TE has a 0.7% higher aggregate performance score, 54.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.
A8-3820, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Pentium G4400TE and A8-3820.
Be aware that Pentium G4400TE is a notebook processor while A8-3820 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G4400TE and A8-3820, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
