A8-3820 vs Pentium G2140
Aggregate performance score
A8-3820 outperforms Pentium G2140 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium G2140 and A8-3820 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2267 | 2238 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Power efficiency | 2.26 | 1.98 |
Architecture codename | no data | Llano (2011−2012) |
Release date | 1 April 2013 (11 years ago) | 20 December 2011 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium G2140 and A8-3820 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | no data | 228 mm2 |
Number of transistors | no data | 1,178 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium G2140 and A8-3820 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA1155 | FM1 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G2140 and A8-3820. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
My WiFi | - | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Security technologies
Pentium G2140 and A8-3820 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | - | no data |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G2140 and A8-3820 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G2140 and A8-3820. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors | AMD Radeon HD 6550D |
Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G2140 and A8-3820 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G2140 and A8-3820.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.32 | 1.37 |
Integrated graphics card | 0.77 | 1.04 |
Recency | 1 April 2013 | 20 December 2011 |
Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 65 Watt |
Pentium G2140 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 18.2% lower power consumption.
A8-3820, on the other hand, has a 3.8% higher aggregate performance score, 35.1% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Pentium G2140 and A8-3820.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G2140 and A8-3820, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.