Celeron G465 vs Pentium G2010

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G2010 and Celeron G465 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2452not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.74no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date21 January 2013 (11 years ago)1 September 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$466$80

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium G2010 and Celeron G465 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.8 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB
L3 cache3072 KB (shared)1.5 MB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size94 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data66 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G2010 and Celeron G465 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G2010 and Celeron G465. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Pentium G2010 and Celeron G465 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G2010 and Celeron G465 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G2010 and Celeron G465. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s17 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz1 GHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G2010 and Celeron G465 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G2010 and Celeron G465.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G2010 1599
+192%
Celeron G465 547

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium G2010 441
+46.5%
Celeron G465 301

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium G2010 644
+57.1%
Celeron G465 410

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 January 2013 1 September 2012
Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 35 Watt

Pentium G2010 has an age advantage of 4 months, 100% more physical cores, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron G465, on the other hand, has 57.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium G2010 and Celeron G465. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G2010 and Celeron G465, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G2010
Pentium G2010
Intel Celeron G465
Celeron G465

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 92 votes

Rate Pentium G2010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 6 votes

Rate Celeron G465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G2010 or Celeron G465, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.