Ryzen 3 2200U vs PRO A10-9700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO A10-9700
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.29
+1.3%
Ryzen 3 2200U
2017
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.26

PRO A10-9700 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200U by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing PRO A10-9700 and Ryzen 3 2200U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18171831
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency3.3314.25
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Raven Ridge (2017−2018)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)26 October 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

PRO A10-9700 and Ryzen 3 2200U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplierno data25
L1 cacheno data128K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size250 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,100 million4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on PRO A10-9700 and Ryzen 3 2200U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4FP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A10-9700 and Ryzen 3 2200U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A10-9700 and Ryzen 3 2200U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A10-9700 and Ryzen 3 2200U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A10-9700 and Ryzen 3 2200U integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A10-9700 and Ryzen 3 2200U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A10-9700 and Ryzen 3 2200U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes812

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A10-9700 2.29
+1.3%
Ryzen 3 2200U 2.26

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

PRO A10-9700 3639
+1.6%
Ryzen 3 2200U 3583

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.29 2.26
Recency 27 July 2017 26 October 2017
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

PRO A10-9700 has a 1.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores.

Ryzen 3 2200U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between PRO A10-9700 and Ryzen 3 2200U.

Note that PRO A10-9700 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 2200U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A10-9700 and Ryzen 3 2200U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A10-9700
PRO A10-9700
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
Ryzen 3 2200U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 4 votes

Rate PRO A10-9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 539 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 2200U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A10-9700 or Ryzen 3 2200U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.