EPYC 9655P vs Opteron 6338P

VS

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6338P and EPYC 9655P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.48
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiencyno data23.66
Architecture codenameWarsaw (2014)Turin (2024)
Release date22 January 2014 (10 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$377$10,811

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6338P and EPYC 9655P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)96
Threads12192
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache576 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per module)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (per die)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size2x 315 mm212x 70.6 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)69 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,400 million99,780 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6338P and EPYC 9655P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketG34SP5
Power consumption (TDP)99 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6338P and EPYC 9655P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6338P and EPYC 9655P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6338P and EPYC 9655P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6338P and EPYC 9655P.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 January 2014 10 October 2024
Physical cores 12 96
Threads 12 192
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 99 Watt 400 Watt

Opteron 6338P has 304% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9655P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Opteron 6338P and EPYC 9655P. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6338P and EPYC 9655P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6338P
Opteron 6338P
AMD EPYC 9655P
EPYC 9655P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 6338P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 77 votes

Rate EPYC 9655P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6338P or EPYC 9655P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.