EPYC 9135 vs Opteron 6274

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6274 and EPYC 9135 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1524not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.56no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency2.91no data
Architecture codenameInterlagos (2011−2012)Turin (2024)
Release date14 November 2011 (13 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$909$1,214

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6274 and EPYC 9135 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache768 KB (shared)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache8.00391 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size316 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors2,400 million16,630 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6274 and EPYC 9135 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketG34SP5
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6274 and EPYC 9135. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6274 and EPYC 9135 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6274 and EPYC 9135. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6274 and EPYC 9135.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 November 2011 10 October 2024
Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 200 Watt

Opteron 6274 has 73.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9135, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, 100% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Opteron 6274 and EPYC 9135. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6274 and EPYC 9135, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6274
Opteron 6274
AMD EPYC 9135
EPYC 9135

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Opteron 6274 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9135 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6274 or EPYC 9135, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.