EPYC 9015 vs Opteron 6276

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6276 and EPYC 9015 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1416not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.09no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency3.29no data
Architecture codenameInterlagos (2011−2012)Turin (2024)
Release date14 November 2011 (13 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119$527

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6276 and EPYC 9015 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache768 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (per die)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size316 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors2,400 million16,630 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6276 and EPYC 9015 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration42
SocketG34SP5
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6276 and EPYC 9015. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6276 and EPYC 9015 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6276 and EPYC 9015. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6276 and EPYC 9015.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 November 2011 10 October 2024
Physical cores 16 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 125 Watt

Opteron 6276 has 100% more physical cores, and 8.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9015, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Opteron 6276 and EPYC 9015. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6276 and EPYC 9015, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6276
Opteron 6276
AMD EPYC 9015
EPYC 9015

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 51 vote

Rate Opteron 6276 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 9015 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6276 or EPYC 9015, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.