Celeron M 360 vs Mobile Sempron SI-40
Aggregate performance score
Mobile Sempron SI-40 outperforms Celeron M 360 by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron M 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3240 | 3335 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Mobile Sempron | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 0.76 | 0.63 |
| Architecture codename | Sable (2008−2009) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | 4 July 2008 (16 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron M 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1800 MHz | 400 MHz |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 1 MB L2 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.26V, 1.004V-1.292V |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron M 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1g2 | PPGA478, H-PBGA479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 21 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron M 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125V | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron M 360 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron M 360 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.20 | 0.14 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 21 Watt |
Mobile Sempron SI-40 has a 42.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 360, on the other hand, has 19% lower power consumption.
The Mobile Sempron SI-40 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 360 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron M 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
