Celeron M 360 vs Mobile Sempron SI-40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron M 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Mobile SempronCeleron M
Architecture codenameSable (2008−2009)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date4 July 2008 (16 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron M 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speedno data1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus rate1800 MHz400 MHz
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cacheno data1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.26V, 1.004V-1.292V

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron M 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1g2PPGA478, H-PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt21 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron M 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125Vno data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron M 360 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron M 360 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 21 Watt

Mobile Sempron SI-40 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 360, on the other hand, has 19% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron M 360. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Celeron M 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Sempron SI-40
Mobile Sempron SI-40
Intel Celeron M 360
Celeron M 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 35 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron SI-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 12 votes

Rate Celeron M 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Sempron SI-40 or Celeron M 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.