Processor N200 vs FX-8320

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8320
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.43
+120%
Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.56

FX-8320 outperforms Processor N200 by a whopping 120% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8320 and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15482107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency2.6024.61
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$193

Detailed specifications

FX-8320 and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.5 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data96 KB (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB2 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature61 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

FX-8320 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320 and Processor N200.

PCIe versionn/a3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.43 1.56
Recency 23 October 2012 3 January 2023
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 6 Watt

FX-8320 has a 119.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Processor N200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 1983.3% lower power consumption.

The FX-8320 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.

Note that FX-8320 is a desktop processor while Processor N200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320 and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8320
FX-8320
Intel Processor N200
Processor N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1387 votes

Rate FX-8320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 145 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8320 or Processor N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.