Itanium 9520 vs FX-8320
Primary details
Comparing FX-8320 and Itanium 9520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1547 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 2.59 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Vishera (2012−2015) | no data |
| Release date | 23 October 2012 (12 years ago) | 1 October 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
FX-8320 and Itanium 9520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 1.73 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | no data |
| Bus rate | no data | 6.4 GT/s |
| L2 cache | 8192 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 20 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 61 °C | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-8320 and Itanium 9520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM3+ | LGA1248 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320 and Itanium 9520. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Security technologies
FX-8320 and Itanium 9520 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320 and Itanium 9520 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| VT-i | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320 and Itanium 9520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320 and Itanium 9520.
| PCIe version | n/a | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 130 Watt |
FX-8320 has 100% more physical cores, and 4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between FX-8320 and Itanium 9520. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-8320 is a desktop processor while Itanium 9520 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320 and Itanium 9520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
