Apple M1 Max vs FX-8140

Place in the ranking	1625	526
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	no data	Apple M-Series
Power efficiency	3.05	no data
Architecture codename	Zambezi (2011−2012)	no data
Release date	23 October 2012 (12 years ago)	18 October 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-8140 and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	8 (Octa-Core)	10 (Deca-Core)
Threads	8	10
Base clock speed	3.2 GHz	2.06 GHz
Boost clock speed	4.1 GHz	3.22 GHz
L1 cache	384 KB	2.9 MB
L2 cache	8 MB	28 MB
L3 cache	8 MB (shared)	48 MB
Chip lithography	32 nm	5 nm
Die size	315 mm²	no data
Number of transistors	1,200 million	57000 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data
Unlocked multiplier	+	-

Compatibility

Information on FX-8140 and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	AM3+	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	2060 ‑ 3220 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8140 and Apple M1 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	-
FMA	+	-
AVX	+	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8140 and Apple M1 Max are enumerated here.

AMD-V

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8140 and Apple M1 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8140 and Apple M1 Max.

PCIe version

2.0

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8140 3.06

Apple M1 Max 13.90
+354%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8140 4860

Apple M1 Max 22080
+354%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.06	13.90
Recency	23 October 2012	18 October 2021
Physical cores	8	10
Threads	8	10
Chip lithography	32 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	2060 Watt

FX-8140 has 2068.4% lower power consumption.

Apple M1 Max, on the other hand, has a 354.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 25% more physical cores and 25% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M1 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8140 in performance tests.

Note that FX-8140 is a desktop processor while Apple M1 Max is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8140 and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.