Core i5-13500H vs FX-7500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-7500
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 19 Watt
2.07
Core i5-13500H
2023
12 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
14.73
+612%

i5-13500H outperforms FX-7500 by a whopping 612% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-7500 and Core i5-13500H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1848465
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriIntel Raptor Lake-H
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Raptor Lake-H
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-7500 and Core i5-13500H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache256 KB1.1 MB
L2 cache2 MB (per module)10 MB
L3 cacheno data18 MB
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors2,410 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on FX-7500 and Core i5-13500H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP3FCBGA1744
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-7500 and Core i5-13500H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSXno data+

Security technologies

FX-7500 and Core i5-13500H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-7500 and Core i5-13500H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-7500 and Core i5-13500H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 (Kaveri)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-7500 and Core i5-13500H.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes88

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-7500 2.07
i5-13500H 14.73
+612%

Core i5-13500H outperforms FX-7500 by 612% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 65%

FX-7500 3209
i5-13500H 22779
+610%

Core i5-13500H outperforms FX-7500 by 610% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

FX-7500 2060
i5-13500H 9664
+369%

Core i5-13500H outperforms FX-7500 by 369% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

FX-7500 5482
i5-13500H 53786
+881%

Core i5-13500H outperforms FX-7500 by 881% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

FX-7500 2771
i5-13500H 14694
+430%

Core i5-13500H outperforms FX-7500 by 430% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

FX-7500 23.32
i5-13500H 3.27
+613%

FX-7500 outperforms Core i5-13500H by 613% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 16%

FX-7500 2
i5-13500H 28
+1548%

Core i5-13500H outperforms FX-7500 by 1548% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

FX-7500 153
i5-13500H 2304
+1406%

Core i5-13500H outperforms FX-7500 by 1406% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

FX-7500 55
i5-13500H 249
+353%

Core i5-13500H outperforms FX-7500 by 353% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

FX-7500 0.65
i5-13500H 3.1
+377%

Core i5-13500H outperforms FX-7500 by 377% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

FX-7500 1.1
i5-13500H 13.3
+1109%

Core i5-13500H outperforms FX-7500 by 1109% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

FX-7500 1479
i5-13500H 7325
+395%

Core i5-13500H outperforms FX-7500 by 395% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 12%

FX-7500 14
i5-13500H 132
+851%

Core i5-13500H outperforms FX-7500 by 851% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 12%

FX-7500 69
i5-13500H 336
+391%

Core i5-13500H outperforms FX-7500 by 391% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.07 14.73
Integrated graphics card 1.48 7.43
Recency 4 June 2014 4 January 2023
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 45 Watt

FX-7500 has 136.8% lower power consumption.

i5-13500H, on the other hand, has a 611.6% higher aggregate performance score, 402% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 200% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i5-13500H is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-7500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-7500 and Core i5-13500H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-7500
FX-7500
Intel Core i5-13500H
Core i5-13500H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 81 vote

Rate FX-7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 831 vote

Rate Core i5-13500H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-7500 or Core i5-13500H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.