Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Core M-5Y70

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core M-5Y70
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.18
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 162 Watt
22.14
+1776%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms M-5Y70 by a whopping 1776% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core M-5Y70 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2300224
Place by popularitynot in top-10018
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data31.82
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core Mno data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Raphael (Zen4)
Release date5 September 2014 (9 years ago)6 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core M-5Y70 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.1 GHz4.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB0.1 MB
L2 cache512 KB0 MB
L3 cache4 MB96 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size82 mm21x 71 mm2 (CCD) + 121 mm2 (I/O) mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C89 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistors1300 Million6570 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core M-5Y70 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketBGAAM5 (LGA 1718)
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt162 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core M-5Y70 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI1, BMI2, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core M-5Y70 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core M-5Y70 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5200
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 5300AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core M-5Y70 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanes1224

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M-5Y70 1.18
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 22.14
+1776%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Core M-5Y70 by 1776% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 65%

M-5Y70 1823
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 34242
+1778%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Core M-5Y70 by 1778% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 40%

M-5Y70 507
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 2715
+436%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Core M-5Y70 by 436% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 40%

M-5Y70 888
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 15129
+1604%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Core M-5Y70 by 1604% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

M-5Y70 3741
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8026
+115%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Core M-5Y70 by 115% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

M-5Y70 6375
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 51950
+715%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Core M-5Y70 by 715% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

M-5Y70 2386
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 16892
+608%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Core M-5Y70 by 608% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

M-5Y70 19.35
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 2.44
+693%

Core M-5Y70 outperforms Ryzen 7 7800X3D by 693% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 16%

M-5Y70 2
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 33
+1502%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Core M-5Y70 by 1502% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

M-5Y70 182
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 2879
+1482%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Core M-5Y70 by 1482% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

M-5Y70 91
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 282
+209%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Core M-5Y70 by 209% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

M-5Y70 1.1
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 3.43
+212%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Core M-5Y70 by 212% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

M-5Y70 1.6
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 15.3
+856%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Core M-5Y70 by 856% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

M-5Y70 2385
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 16585
+595%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Core M-5Y70 by 595% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 12%

M-5Y70 12
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 169
+1358%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Core M-5Y70 by 1358% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 12%

M-5Y70 91
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 344
+276%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Core M-5Y70 by 276% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.18 22.14
Integrated graphics card 1.21 4.34
Recency 5 September 2014 6 April 2023
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 162 Watt

M-5Y70 has 3950% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 7800X3D, on the other hand, has a 1776.3% higher aggregate performance score, 258.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the Core M-5Y70 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core M-5Y70 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core M-5Y70 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core M-5Y70
Core M-5Y70
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 5 votes

Rate Core M-5Y70 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1486 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7800X3D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core M-5Y70 or Ryzen 7 7800X3D, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.