Ryzen 7 5700 vs EPYC 9754

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9754
2023
128 cores / 256 threads, 360 Watt
63.24
+314%
Ryzen 7 5700
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
15.27

EPYC 9754 outperforms Ryzen 7 5700 by a whopping 314% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9754 and Ryzen 7 5700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12460
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.0961.05
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency16.6222.23
Architecture codenameBergamo (2023)Cezanne (2021−2024)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)4 April 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,900$179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 5700 has 5501% better value for money than EPYC 9754.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9754 and Ryzen 7 5700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1288 (Octa-Core)
Threads25616
Base clock speed2.25 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography5 nm7 nm
Die size8x 73 mm2180 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors71,000 million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9754 and Ryzen 7 5700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5AM4
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and Ryzen 7 5700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and Ryzen 7 5700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and Ryzen 7 5700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and Ryzen 7 5700.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9754 63.24
+314%
Ryzen 7 5700 15.27

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9754 100460
+314%
Ryzen 7 5700 24262

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 9754 1603
Ryzen 7 5700 2001
+24.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 9754 15552
+77.2%
Ryzen 7 5700 8777

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 63.24 15.27
Recency 13 June 2023 4 April 2022
Physical cores 128 8
Threads 256 16
Chip lithography 5 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 9754 has a 314.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen 7 5700, on the other hand, has 453.8% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9754 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 5700 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9754 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 5700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9754 and Ryzen 7 5700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754
AMD Ryzen 7 5700
Ryzen 7 5700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 37 votes

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 249 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9754 or Ryzen 7 5700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.