Xeon Silver 4410T vs EPYC 9174F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9174F
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 320 Watt
34.93
+92.2%
Xeon Silver 4410T
2023
10 cores / 20 threads, 150 Watt
18.17

EPYC 9174F outperforms Xeon Silver 4410T by an impressive 92% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9174F and Xeon Silver 4410T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking106335
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.1072.05
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency10.3211.46
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,850$624

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4410T has 915% better value for money than EPYC 9174F.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9174F and Xeon Silver 4410T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads3220
Base clock speed4.1 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier41no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)26.25 MB
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size8x 72 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data84 °C
Number of transistors52,560 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9174F and Xeon Silver 4410T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP5FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9174F and Xeon Silver 4410T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 9174F and Xeon Silver 4410T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9174F and Xeon Silver 4410T are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9174F and Xeon Silver 4410T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5-4000
Maximum memory size6 TiB4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9174F and Xeon Silver 4410T.

PCIe version5.05
PCI Express lanes12880

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9174F 34.93
+92.2%
Xeon Silver 4410T 18.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9174F 55485
+92.3%
Xeon Silver 4410T 28859

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.93 18.17
Recency 10 November 2022 10 January 2023
Physical cores 16 10
Threads 32 20
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 150 Watt

EPYC 9174F has a 92.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 60% more physical cores and 60% more threads.

Xeon Silver 4410T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 113.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9174F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4410T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9174F and Xeon Silver 4410T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9174F
EPYC 9174F
Intel Xeon Silver 4410T
Xeon Silver 4410T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 9174F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 17 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4410T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9174F or Xeon Silver 4410T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.