EPYC 9224 vs EPYC 9174F

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9174F
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 320 Watt
35.60
+30.7%
EPYC 9224
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 200 Watt
27.23

EPYC 9174F outperforms EPYC 9224 by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9174F and EPYC 9224 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking105180
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.6911.99
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency10.3312.65
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,850$1,825

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9224 has 79% better value for money than EPYC 9174F.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9174F and EPYC 9224 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads3248
Base clock speed4.1 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplier4125
L1 cache1 MB1536 KB
L2 cache16 MB24 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size8x 72 mm24x 72 mm2
Number of transistors52,560 million26,280 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9174F and EPYC 9224 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9174F and EPYC 9224. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9174F and EPYC 9224 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9174F and EPYC 9224. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size6 TiB6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9174F and EPYC 9224.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9174F 35.60
+30.7%
EPYC 9224 27.23

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9174F 55485
+30.7%
EPYC 9224 42448

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.60 27.23
Physical cores 16 24
Threads 32 48
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 200 Watt

EPYC 9174F has a 30.7% higher aggregate performance score.

EPYC 9224, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and 60% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9174F is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 9224 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9174F and EPYC 9224, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9174F
EPYC 9174F
AMD EPYC 9224
EPYC 9224

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 9174F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 9224 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9174F or EPYC 9224, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.