5 210H vs EPYC 7H12

VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7H12 and Core 5 210H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking49not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency14.82no data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
Release date18 September 2019 (5 years ago)18 December 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$342

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7H12 and Core 5 210H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads12812
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.8 GHz
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache96K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7H12 and Core 5 210H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4Intel BGA 1744
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7H12 and Core 5 210H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 7H12 and Core 5 210H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7H12 and Core 5 210H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7H12 and Core 5 210H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIris Xe Graphics 48EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7H12 and Core 5 210H.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 September 2019 18 December 2024
Physical cores 64 8
Threads 128 12
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 45 Watt

EPYC 7H12 has 700% more physical cores and 966.7% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

5 210H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and 522.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7H12 and Core 5 210H. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation processor while Core 5 210H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7H12 and Core 5 210H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12
Intel Core 5 210H
Core 5 210H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 452 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 5 210H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7H12 or Core 5 210H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.