Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs EPYC 7662

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7662
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
45.51
+223%
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2024
8 cores / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads, 28 Watt
14.11

EPYC 7662 outperforms Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 by a whopping 223% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7662 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking43521
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency19.1347.66
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date19 February 2020 (4 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7662 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads12816 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data54 MHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache4 MBno data
L2 cache32 MBno data
L3 cache256 MBno data
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm4 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7662 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketSocket SP3FP8
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7662 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7662 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7662 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 880M

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7662 45.51
+223%
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 14.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7662 72298
+223%
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 22406

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 45.51 14.11
Recency 19 February 2020 1 October 2024
Physical cores 64 8
Threads 128 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 28 Watt

EPYC 7662 has a 222.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, -87.5% more threads, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 703.6% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7662 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7662 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7662 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7662
EPYC 7662
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7662 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7662 or Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.