Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs EPYC 7662

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7662
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
45.51
+131%
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 54 Watt
19.68

EPYC 7662 outperforms Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 by a whopping 131% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7662 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking43291
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency19.1334.47
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date19 February 2020 (4 years ago)25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7662 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads12824
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz5.1 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache4 MBno data
L2 cache32 MB12 MB
L3 cache256 MB24 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm4 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7662 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketSocket SP3FP8
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt54 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7662 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7662 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7662 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7662 45.51
+131%
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 19.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7662 72298
+131%
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 31255

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 45.51 19.68
Recency 19 February 2020 25 July 2024
Physical cores 64 12
Threads 128 24
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 54 Watt

EPYC 7662 has a 131.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 433.3% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7662 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7662 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7662 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7662
EPYC 7662
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7662 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7662 or Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.