Apple M1 vs EPYC 7502P

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7502P
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
31.99
+519%

EPYC 7502P outperforms Apple M1 by a whopping 519% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7502P and Apple M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1271194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.15no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCApple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency16.82no data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)no data
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,300no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7502P and Apple M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads648
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache96K (per core)2 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)16 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm5 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 million16000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7502P and Apple M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketTR4no data
Power consumption (TDP)180 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7502P and Apple M1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7502P and Apple M1 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7502P and Apple M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelno data
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 8-Core GPU

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7502P 31.99
+519%
Apple M1 5.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7502P 50818
+519%
Apple M1 8207

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.99 5.17
Recency 7 August 2019 10 November 2020
Physical cores 32 8
Threads 64 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm

EPYC 7502P has a 518.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Apple M1, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7502P is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7502P is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7502P and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7502P
EPYC 7502P
Apple M1
M1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7502P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2237 votes

Rate Apple M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7502P or Apple M1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.