Ryzen 9 5900HS vs EPYC 7402P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7402P
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
28.27
+104%
Ryzen 9 5900HS
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
13.89

EPYC 7402P outperforms Ryzen 9 5900HS by a whopping 104% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7402P and Ryzen 9 5900HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking171540
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.53no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency14.5936.86
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,250no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7402P and Ryzen 9 5900HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4816
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz4.6 GHz
Multiplier2830
L1 cache96K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm
Die size192 mm2180 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7402P and Ryzen 9 5900HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4FP6
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7402P and Ryzen 9 5900HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7402P and Ryzen 9 5900HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7402P and Ryzen 9 5900HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7402P and Ryzen 9 5900HS.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7402P 28.27
+104%
Ryzen 9 5900HS 13.89

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7402P 44070
+104%
Ryzen 9 5900HS 21654

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.27 13.89
Recency 7 August 2019 12 January 2021
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 48 16
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 35 Watt

EPYC 7402P has a 103.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Ryzen 9 5900HS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 414.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7402P is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 5900HS in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7402P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 5900HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7402P and Ryzen 9 5900HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7402P
EPYC 7402P
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
Ryzen 9 5900HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 6 votes

Rate EPYC 7402P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 174 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7402P or Ryzen 9 5900HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.