Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) vs EPYC 7401

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7401
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 170 Watt
34.80
+24.4%
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
2024
12 cores / 12 threads, 32 Watt
27.97

EPYC 7401 outperforms Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7401 and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking106167
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.53no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCApple M4
Power efficiency19.2782.29
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)no data
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,850no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7401 and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads4812
Base clock speed2 GHz2.592 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.51 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7401 and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4no data
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt32 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7401 and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7401 and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7401 and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M4 16-core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7401 and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores).

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.80 27.97
Recency 29 June 2017 30 October 2024
Physical cores 24 12
Threads 48 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 32 Watt

EPYC 7401 has a 24.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 431.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7401 is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7401 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7401 and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7401
EPYC 7401
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
M4 Pro (12 cores)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 7401 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7401 or Apple M4 Pro (12 cores), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.