EPYC 7371 vs Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
2024
12 cores / 12 threads, 32 Watt
27.97
+44.3%
EPYC 7371
2018
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
19.38

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) outperforms EPYC 7371 by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and EPYC 7371 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking167296
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.62
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesApple M4AMD EPYC
Power efficiency82.2910.73
Architecture codenameno dataNaples (2017−2018)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)16 November 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,550

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and EPYC 7371 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1232
Base clock speed2.592 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplierno data31
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and EPYC 7371 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2 (Multiprocessor)
Socketno dataTR4
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and EPYC 7371. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and EPYC 7371 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and EPYC 7371. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data170.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M4 16-core GPUno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and EPYC 7371.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.97 19.38
Recency 30 October 2024 16 November 2018
Physical cores 12 16
Threads 12 32
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 170 Watt

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) has a 44.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 431.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7371, on the other hand, has 33.3% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

The Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7371 in performance tests.

Note that Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) is a desktop processor while EPYC 7371 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and EPYC 7371, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
M4 Pro (12 cores)
AMD EPYC 7371
EPYC 7371

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 11 votes

Rate EPYC 7371 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) or EPYC 7371, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.