EPYC 8324P vs EPYC 4564P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 4564P
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
39.07
+8.6%
EPYC 8324P
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
35.96

EPYC 4564P outperforms EPYC 8324P by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 4564P and EPYC 8324P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking72101
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation53.4716.61
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency21.7518.91
Architecture codenameRaphael (2023−2024)Siena (2023−2024)
Release date21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)18 September 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699$1,895

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4564P has 222% better value for money than EPYC 8324P.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 4564P and EPYC 8324P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads3264
Base clock speed4.5 GHz2.65 GHz
Boost clock speed5.7 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm5 nm
Die size2x 71 mm24x 73 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)47 °C75 °C
Number of transistors13,140 million35,500 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 4564P and EPYC 8324P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM5SP6
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4564P and EPYC 8324P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4564P and EPYC 8324P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4564P and EPYC 8324P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon GraphicsN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4564P and EPYC 8324P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes2896

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 4564P 39.07
+8.6%
EPYC 8324P 35.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 4564P 62061
+8.6%
EPYC 8324P 57127

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.07 35.96
Recency 21 May 2024 18 September 2023
Physical cores 16 32
Threads 32 64
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 180 Watt

EPYC 4564P has a 8.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and 5.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 8324P, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 4564P and EPYC 8324P.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 4564P and EPYC 8324P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 4564P
EPYC 4564P
AMD EPYC 8324P
EPYC 8324P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 4564P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8324P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 4564P or EPYC 8324P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.