Atom N475 vs E2-6110

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing E2-6110 and Atom N475 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2694not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesIntel Atom
Power efficiency4.46no data
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Pineview (2009−2011)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)1 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$75

Detailed specifications

E2-6110 and Atom N475 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data1.83 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz1.83 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data66 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data123 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-6110 and Atom N475 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3bFCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-6110 and Atom N475. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-

Security technologies

E2-6110 and Atom N475 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-6110 and Atom N475 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-6110 and Atom N475. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data2 GB
Max memory channels11

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R2 GraphicsIntel GMA 3150
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-6110 and Atom N475 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-6110 and Atom N475 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-6110 and Atom N475.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-6110 1128
+530%
Atom N475 179

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 April 2014 1 June 2010
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 6 Watt

E2-6110 has an age advantage of 3 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N475, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between E2-6110 and Atom N475. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-6110 and Atom N475, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-6110
E2-6110
Intel Atom N475
Atom N475

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 135 votes

Rate E2-6110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 2 votes

Rate Atom N475 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-6110 or Atom N475, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.