C-30 vs E2-3200

Place in the ranking	2800	3371
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	no data	AMD C-Series
Power efficiency	0.89	1.16
Architecture codename	Llano (2011−2012)	Ontario (2011−2012)
Release date	7 September 2011 (13 years ago)	4 January 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-3200 and C-30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	2	1
Base clock speed	2.4 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2.4 GHz	1.2 GHz
L1 cache	128 KB (per core)	64 KB
L2 cache	512 KB (per core)	512 KB
L3 cache	0 KB	0 KB
Chip lithography	32 nm	40 nm
Die size	228 mm²	75 mm²
Number of transistors	1,178 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on E2-3200 and C-30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FM1	FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3200 and C-30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions

no data

40 nm, 1.24-1.35V

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3200 and C-30 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3200 and C-30. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

DDR3 Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

Radeon HD 6370D

AMD Radeon HD 6250

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-3200 0.61
+455%

C-30 0.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-3200 968
+444%

C-30 178

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.61	0.11
Recency	7 September 2011	4 January 2011
Physical cores	2	1
Threads	2	1
Chip lithography	32 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	9 Watt

E2-3200 has a 454.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

C-30, on the other hand, has 622.2% lower power consumption.

The E2-3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the C-30 in performance tests.

Note that E2-3200 is a desktop processor while C-30 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3200 and C-30, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.