Ryzen 5 6600HS vs E-350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E-350
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.26
Ryzen 5 6600HS
2022
6 cores / 12 threads, 35 Watt
11.83
+4450%

Ryzen 5 6600HS outperforms E-350 by a whopping 4450% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E-350 and Ryzen 5 6600HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3203688
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency1.3832.19
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022)
Release date4 January 2011 (14 years ago)January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E-350 and Ryzen 5 6600HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm6 nm
Die size75 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on E-350 and Ryzen 5 6600HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1FP7
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-350 and Ryzen 5 6600HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4AMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-350 and Ryzen 5 6600HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-350 and Ryzen 5 6600HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare HD 6310 and Radeon 660M
AMD Radeon HD 6310AMD Radeon 660M ( - 1900 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-350 and Ryzen 5 6600HS.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

E-350 0.26
Ryzen 5 6600HS 11.83
+4450%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E-350 425
Ryzen 5 6600HS 18975
+4365%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

E-350 1049
Ryzen 5 6600HS 6157
+487%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

E-350 2005
Ryzen 5 6600HS 34414
+1616%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

E-350 1
Ryzen 5 6600HS 19
+3015%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.26 11.83
Integrated graphics card 0.27 7.08
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 35 Watt

E-350 has 94.4% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 6600HS, on the other hand, has a 4450% higher aggregate performance score, 2522.2% faster integrated GPU, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 6600HS is our recommended choice as it beats the E-350 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-350
E-350
AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS
Ryzen 5 6600HS

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 428 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 68 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 6600HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors E-350 and Ryzen 5 6600HS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.