Ryzen 3 7320U vs E-350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E-350
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.27
Ryzen 3 7320U
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
5.57
+1963%

Ryzen 3 7320U outperforms E-350 by a whopping 1963% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E-350 and Ryzen 3 7320U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31321146
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesMendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Power efficiency1.4235.14
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022)
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E-350 and Ryzen 3 7320U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm6 nm
Die size75 mm2100 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on E-350 and Ryzen 3 7320U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1FP6
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-350 and Ryzen 3 7320U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4AMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-350 and Ryzen 3 7320U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-350 and Ryzen 3 7320U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6310AMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-350 and Ryzen 3 7320U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E-350 0.27
Ryzen 3 7320U 5.57
+1963%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E-350 421
Ryzen 3 7320U 8850
+2002%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E-350 106
Ryzen 3 7320U 1158
+992%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E-350 182
Ryzen 3 7320U 3606
+1881%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 5.57
Integrated graphics card 0.32 2.85
Recency 4 January 2011 20 September 2022
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 3 7320U has a 1963% higher aggregate performance score, 790.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 566.7% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 7320U is our recommended choice as it beats the E-350 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E-350 and Ryzen 3 7320U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-350
E-350
AMD Ryzen 3 7320U
Ryzen 3 7320U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 386 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 692 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 7320U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E-350 or Ryzen 3 7320U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.