Xeon Gold 5317 vs A4-1350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-1350
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.58
Xeon Gold 5317
2021
12 cores / 24 threads, 150 Watt
17.57
+2929%

Xeon Gold 5317 outperforms A4-1350 by a whopping 2929% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-1350 and Xeon Gold 5317 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2807365
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency6.7310.88
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date18 October 2013 (11 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-1350 and Xeon Gold 5317 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °C84 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A4-1350 and Xeon Gold 5317 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFT3FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-1350 and Xeon Gold 5317. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

A4-1350 and Xeon Gold 5317 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-1350 and Xeon Gold 5317 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-1350 and Xeon Gold 5317. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8210no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-1350 and Xeon Gold 5317.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-1350 0.58
Xeon Gold 5317 17.57
+2929%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-1350 911
Xeon Gold 5317 27387
+2906%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.58 17.57
Recency 18 October 2013 6 April 2021
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 150 Watt

A4-1350 has 1775% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5317, on the other hand, has a 2929.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 5317 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-1350 in performance tests.

Be aware that A4-1350 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 5317 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-1350 and Xeon Gold 5317, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-1350
A4-1350
Intel Xeon Gold 5317
Xeon Gold 5317

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 7 votes

Rate A4-1350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 20 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5317 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-1350 or Xeon Gold 5317, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.